APPENDIX IV
THE
COVENANTAL SABBATH
SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS ACKNOWLEDGE SINAITIC
DECALOGUE
AND MORAL LAW NOT IDENTICAL
That the Ten Commandments of Sinai, though correctly
representing the exact sence of the imperishable and unchangeable
moral law, are nevertheless cast a peculiarly non-essential infralapsarian
form thereof, also seems to be frankly admitted by the most
authoritative spokesman for Seventh-Day Adventism, Mrs. E. G.
White, where she writes: "The Law of Jehovah, dating
back to creation, was comprised in the two great principles, ‘Thou
shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy
soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength. This is
the first commandment. And the second is like, namely this: Thou
shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment
greater than these’. These two great principles embrace the first
four commandments showing the duty of man to God, and the last six,
showing the duty of man to his fellow man. The principles were more
explicitly stated man after the fall, and worded to meet
the case of fallen intelligences. This is necessary in
consequence of the minds of men being blinded by transgression".
(White: Signs of the Times, April 15th, 1875).
[Our italics—N.L.].
Hence Mrs. White maintains that the "law
of Jehovah" was "comprised in the two
great principles" of Matt. 22 :36-40 at "creation";
that "these principles were more explicitly stated
to man after the fall"; and that they were then
"worded to meet the case of fallen intelligences"
— hence (re-) worded, or worded differently their
prior manner of communication which (re-)wording, she states,
was necessary in consequence of the minds of men being blinded
by transgression". Could the non-identical-ness of the
form (or wording) of the Ten Commandments as such
and the essence (or content) of the moral law as such be
made clearer than this?
Yost also supplies the following helpful
table to prove that the moral law (and hence the sabbath)
existed before Sinai:
"The law, or the sins it condemns, known
from Eden: Rom. 5:12-17; 7:7; Gen. 3:7-21; 26:1-5:
(i) |
Commandment |
1: |
|
Gen. 11:1-19; Rom. 1:20-26. |
(ii) |
Commandment |
2: |
|
Gen. 31:19; 35:2-4. |
(iii) |
Commandment |
3: |
|
Gen. 27:1-41; with Heb.
12:16. |
(iv) |
Commandment |
4: |
|
Exodus 16:27, 28. |
(v) |
Commandment |
5: |
|
Gen. 9:20-27. |
(vi) |
Commandment |
6: |
|
Gen. 4:8-15. |
(vii) |
Commandment |
7: |
|
Gen. 34:1-7; 39:7-9. |
(viii) |
Commandment |
8: |
|
Gen. 31:29-37. |
(ix) |
Commandment |
9: |
|
Gen. 26:6-11; 27:1-45. |
(x) |
Commandment |
10: |
|
Gen. 13:10, 11". (Yost:
"Doctrine", etc., p. 7f.) |
Now let Yost’s heading here be noted. It runs:
"The law, OR the sins it condemns, known from
Eden". Exactly! Here is yet another tacit admission that the
form in which God’s moral law comes to man at any given
point in history is by no means identical to its essence and
basic authority for all given points in history, as a comparison
of each item of this table of Yost’s with the Ten Commandments or
with the whole of our table immediately after p. 23 (supra)
will soon show.
Return
to the Main Highway 
Return
to the Table of Contents
Return
to Calvinism and the Reformed Faith Index

|