Quote
catholicsoldier retorts:
Well, sir, you will also not find any scripture allowing the practice or a precident of rebaptism.
As far as I'm concerned a non-valid baptism is no baptism. And thus "re-baptism" is actually the initial valid baptism. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> Thus, in such situations, there is no "re-baptism" but an initial baptism which is warranted.

Quote
Any adult convert who has been baptized in any Christian faith in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, (the only scriptural requirements) will not have to be rebaptized in the Catholic faith.
I don't have a problem with a baptism which was done "in any Christian faith". What I do have a problem with is with baptism performed outside the Christian faith. As I made clear, it is my firm belief that Rome is apostate and is not to be included in "the Christian faith". Thus baptisms performed by Rome don't qualify.

In His Grace,

[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]