speratus,

Methinks you are switching horses in the middle of the stream here. The original question you asked me, in reference to my rejection of baptism administered by the Roman State Church was:

Quote
What's your opinion regarding the validity of baptism performed by the apostate Reformed Church in the name of the feminist modalist deity (i.e. Creator, Redeemer, and Sustainer)?

But now you have brought in the issue of membership, which I consider to be an entirely different animal; an addition to the original question.

Quote
speratus then remarks:
It is interesting I, a Lutheran, agree with Calvin on the validity of baptism; whereas, you, a Calvinist, do not agree with Calvin. With Calvin, I accept the validity of baptisms perform by the cult of the AntiChrist (since they do not change Christ's institution) but I reject the validity of baptisms performed by Reform (RCA) and Lutheran (ELCA) cults who baptism in the name of some feminist modalist deity.
I follow Calvin wherever he is in agreement with the Scriptures and not otherwise. As I have said all along and for years previous, I believe Calvin to have accredited far too much to baptism in certain areas without a solid biblical warrant to do so. Perhaps I need to remind you once again that I hold to Sola Scriptura and not Sola Calvinura! <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" /> And I repeat here also, that I do not hold that the Tridentine formula recited by a priest, bishop, elder, pastor, etc.. is the sole requisite for a valid baptism. What is also required is a valid profession of the one administering the sacrament, and a valid profession of faith of the recipient or of the parents of the infant being baptized. Since Rome is apostate in its doctrine as are all cults; they are not of the true church, then I reject the baptisms administered by them. For the command to baptize was given to the CHURCH and non else.

In His Grace,


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]