Quote
speratus said:
There is a difference in mode between His comprehensible, bodily mode according to the property of human nature which we can perceive with our senses and His incomprehensible, spiritual mode according to the property of the right hand of God which is not perceived by human senses. The proof of this is that the disciples could see only bread. Even today, those of us who receive the Lord's body see, feel, and taste only bread. But we know that His body is given and eaten by the disciples and by those who do not change His word because Christ does not lie or deceive.

You prove your point by assuming it to be true in the first place. Very, very poor argumentation, Speratus! If the mode in which His body is present in the Lord's Supper is by the "incomprehensible, spiritual mode according to the property of the right hand of God," and NOT by the "comprehensible, bodily mode according to the property of human nature," then how do you say that His BODILY, HUMAN NATURE is present in the bread??? Your doctrine is self-defeating and destroys the distinction between the human and divine natures in the Person of Christ. Not to mention that it is simply ridiculous to say that if His flesh is not literally present in the bread, then Christ is a liar! That's as silly as saying that since Christ is not literally a lamb, He's a liar!

Kyle

I tell you, this man went down to his house justified.