First, I still don't see a difference between Sola and Solo Scriptura nor does the author sufficiently explain it.
Second, the conclusion is contradictory:
>> Ultimately, the fundamental problem with solo scriptura is the same problem that exists within the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox concepts of Scripture and tradition. All of these concepts result in autonomy. All result in final authority being placed somewhere other than God and His Word. The Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox doctrines result in the autonomy of the Church. Solo scriptura results in the autonomy of the individual believer who becomes a law unto himself. Scripture is interpreted according to the conscience and reason of the individual.
Is the author a non-Christian? If the answer isn't in the autonomy of the Church nor the individual believer as the conclusion states, then what is the pillar and foundation of Truth? What is this article supposed to conclude?
