Quote
speratus said:

Mr. Cloute does not dispute that. What Mr. Cloute is disputing is the Reformed doctrine that expands the divine presence of Christ beyond His physical body at certain times after the Incarnation. As Chalcedon and the other Creeds teach, after the divine took on flesh, the divine and human natures are inseparable in "one person and subsistence, not as parted or separated into two persons."

I'm not aware of anyone who claims that Christ's divine nature "expands" at some "times" after the Incarnation. Christ is "recognized in two natures, without confusion, without change, without division, without separation; the distinction of natures being in no way annulled by the union, but rather the characteristics of each nature being preserved." The divine nature remained and remains as it was from eternity. The human nature also remains human.

Kyle

I tell you, this man went down to his house justified.