One of the best critiques of Dooyeweerdianism is John Frame's The Amsterdam Philosophy. Ronald Nash also wrote a good critique of this philosophy too. And Cornelius Van Til wrote a strong critique of Dooyeweerd's views after having been in favor of them previously.<br><br>Reconstructionists have also been very critical of Dooyeweerd's (and Kuyper's) "Sphere Sovereignty". At best, Dooyeweerd's Neo-Calvinism can be called "left wing Calvinism" due to its support of various left wing political views (ie. Socialism). Gary North wrote a strong critique of this type of Neo-Calvinism entitled, Social Antinomianism. This Neo-Calvinism is also seen in the more recent "Principled Pluralist" movement who are the philosophical successors of Dooyeweerdism. Dr. Robert Knudsen of Westminster Seminary east, was an advocate of Dooyeweerdism. <br><br>The book, God and Politics: Four Views on the Reformation of Civil Government edited by Gary Scott Smith gives a Theonomic critique of Neo-calvinism and its Principled Pluralism views.<br><br>Colin
