<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr>[color:"blue"]Pilgrim addressed the rest of your post revealing once again its historical inconsistencies and other errors.</font><hr></blockquote><p><br><br>Really? Where exactly did Pilgrim reveal "any historical inconsistencies" of mine? I haven't seen him address them anywhere, but only dismiss them as "obscure".<br><br>I am not going to address the rest of your comments with a response. You and Dave Hunt would make a great team since you both use the same style of arguments, and he also opposes Reconstructionism as strongly as you do.<br><br>But I am just surprised that Pilgrim and Wesley lets you get away with the kind of remarks you make against other reformed Christian's theological views. Its one thing to faithfully contend against damnable heresies, its quite another to make the same kind of accusations towards certain theological views that all orthodox and reformed Christians have internally differed amongst themselves on. <br><br>Colin