<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr>[color:"blue"]So I admit that I was wrong to claim that I never called "anyone" "unread" about Reconstructionism, for I did say that about Joe in particular. But this example you cited should be more embarassing for you and Joe and Wesley than for me, simply due to Joe's extremely offensive and hostile criticisms. All one has to do is compare Ligon Duncan's first critique of Reconstructionism with Joe's public remarks on this forum and then see the vast difference between them. Duncan himself even warned against using "Abusive ad hominem and sensationalism in most responses to this issue".</font><hr></blockquote><p> You make a habit of character Assassinations and "you" yourself are [color:red]extremely offensive and full of hostile criticisms</font color=red> as can be seen from your results of your other posts here and on other forums. Here is an example from an exchange between Joe Bell and Reg Barrow, of which Greg says that Joe Bell/you have never replied:<br><br><blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr>[color:"blue"][color:blue]<font class="big">Joe, lay off the goofiness, you could care less about me (as if you were so high-minded as to be trying to protect me from embarrassment -- what a joke). Your constant barrage of email slanders, censorship of my refutations of your positions at CS, and even your stooping to have someone publicly slander me over the list you control (under the cover of anonymity which you suggested) have proved time and time again that you will use the most dishonest and antichristian methods to discredit the covenanted reformation in our day. At least be honest enough to own up to this fact. <br><br>Furthermore, concerning your having [color:red]Colin Tayler publicly slander me</font color=red> without putting his name to his scurrilous piece of writing, I think you should ask Andrew Sandlin what R.J. Rushdoony thinks of such cowardly tactics. Even Judas betrayed Christ with a kiss -- and to his face. </font><hr></blockquote><p></font color=blue></font mu=big> A CONTEMPORARY COVENANTING DEBATE; OR, COVENANTING REDIVIVUS. The amazing thing Colin is that apparently this was YEARS ago and YOU still have not made amends! <br><br>You are not welcome here if you continue in this manner!

Reformed and Always Reforming,