|

|
|
|
Posts: 706
Joined: May 2016
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,376
Posts56,576
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295 May 22nd, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 40
Newbie
|
Newbie
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 40 |
3. Re: Newman's illustration, unfortunately it doesn't represent the reality of the situation. It isn't that the human race has jumped into the ocean and without a life preserver they would all surely drown. To go with the scenario, the biblical teaching is that the entire human race has already drowned and is lying on the bottom of the ocean DEAD. There is no "life preserver" in existence that could possibly save them. They are stone dead. But God, Who is rich in mercy and grace resurrects some to life (regeneration) and leaves the rest. My illustration (of drowning) was a slight modification of an illustration used by a staunch Reformed guy to explain such things to me. If you prefer to weave total depravity into the illustration, that's certainly fine, and it doesn't seem to me to alter the main point. Again, its another distinction without a difference, as far as I can tell. Whether at the bottom of the ocean, drowned and dead, or at the top, certain to drown and die, it remains that God chooses to save some from eternal torment and chooses not to save some from eternal torment. With the former, He chooses not to resurrect some to life (and therefore from eternal torment.) With the latter He chooses not to save some persons from drowning (and therefore from eternal torment.) In either case, God chooses some for eternal torment, though Calvinists (at least in my experience) prefer to use phrases like "God passes by" or "God leaves" instead of "God chooses," and understandably so.
Last edited by Newman; Wed May 25, 2011 6:01 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Should be obviously wrong, right?
|
lost
|
Tue May 24, 2011 6:12 AM
|
Re: Should be obviously wrong, right?
|
Newman
|
Wed May 25, 2011 6:22 PM
|
Re: Should be obviously wrong, right?
|
Pilgrim
|
Wed May 25, 2011 8:22 PM
|
Re: Should be obviously wrong, right?
|
Newman
|
Wed May 25, 2011 9:34 PM
|
Re: Should be obviously wrong, right?
|
Pilgrim
|
Wed May 25, 2011 11:28 PM
|
Re: Should be obviously wrong, right?
|
Newman
|
Thu May 26, 2011 12:00 AM
|
Re: Should be obviously wrong, right?
|
Pilgrim
|
Thu May 26, 2011 2:03 AM
|
Re: Should be obviously wrong, right?
|
Pilgrim
|
Thu May 26, 2011 12:53 PM
|
Re: Should be obviously wrong, right?
|
AC.
|
Thu May 26, 2011 5:37 PM
|
Re: Should be obviously wrong, right?
|
Reformation Monk
|
Thu May 26, 2011 7:24 PM
|
Re: Should be obviously wrong, right?
|
AC.
|
Thu May 26, 2011 10:44 PM
|
Re: Should be obviously wrong, right?
|
AC.
|
Thu May 26, 2011 5:53 PM
|
Re: Should be obviously wrong, right?
|
Pilgrim
|
Thu May 26, 2011 6:35 PM
|
Re: Should be obviously wrong, right?
|
AC.
|
Thu May 26, 2011 6:44 PM
|
Re: Should be obviously wrong, right?
|
AC.
|
Fri May 27, 2011 1:48 PM
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
253
guests, and
22
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|