What exactly is the "great" James White in disagreement with in the WCF/LBCF statement? scratch1

Secondly, even the mention of William Lane Craig makes me cringe.

From a Wiki article on Craig:

Quote
Divine Omniscience
Craig is a proponent of Molinism, an idea first formulated by the Jesuit theologian Luis de Molina according to which God possesses foreknowledge of which free actions each person would perform under every possible circumstance, a kind of knowledge that is sometimes termed "middle knowledge."[92] Protestant-Molinism, such as Craig's, first entered Protestant theology through two anti-Calvinist thinkers: Jacobus Arminius and Conrad Vorstius.[93][94] Molinists such as Craig appeal to this idea to reconcile the perceived conflict between God's providence and foreknowledge with human free will. The idea is that, by relying on middle knowledge, God does not interfere with anyone's free will, instead choosing which circumstances to actualize given a complete understanding of how people would freely choose to act in response.[95] Craig also appeals to Molinism in his discussions of the inspiration of scripture, Christian exclusivism, the perseverance of the Saints, and missionary evangelism.[96]
I stand in 100% agreement with the judgment of the Council of Dordt (1618-19) against the Arminians objection to the Belgic Confession... their doctrine was damnable heresy!!

Perhaps James White has reached the stratosphere of intellectualism where men lose their senses due to a lack oxygen to the brain and which also inflates their ego?


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]