Pilgrim, this is helpful. I have some questions and comments; to hopefully flesh this out a bit more.

1. If I wanted to be real nitpicky, I would take issue with “we are to be winning the nations".
However, it is my experience that when most people of Calvinist persuasion (which they are) say something like that. They are talking about as you put it: “What I find is to evangelize the nations, i.e., preach the Gospel for the purpose of calling the elect to repentance and faith who make up the 'remnant' who are of God's chosen race.”
The reason I say that, is because this is a basic Calvinist soteriological understanding that I learned early on as I was studying Calvinism.

So, although I do not think it is wrong to correct someone about that. Knowing Calvinist soteriology, unless I am missing something. What you said is what they mean.


2. I think I can agree with you here; their concept of “victory” is probably more in line with the Postmillenialism of Rushdoony, than the Amillenialism of someone like Waldron.

I must admit, I did not pick that up as I was watching that. Perhaps that is the case with my friend, who is Amil?


3. As I read what you said; I must admit that although the more I read on the topic I understand more, I am not as yet knowledgeable enough to speak to that issue.

I noticed you mentioned Sam Waldron’s article. As you know, I recently posted that article on the Highway. Does the article mention this issue in it? If so, I must have missed it.
Can you point me where in the article I can find it?

If not, perhaps you can point me to where I can?

Tom