From what I am seeing many denominations are following suit. There is even "some talk" in the PCA about doing the same!!!! Some here are estimating it will be in the PCA in the next 10 years....As always the REAL church will always survive through it all, but it is certainly a pitiful state of affairs.
How much "talk" is there, and how will they get the conservatives to go along with it? Surely there is a much higher percentage of conservatives in PCA leadership and membership than in the PCUSA! I would hope the PCA is keeping a close eye on what is being taught at seminaries and in its literature, as seminaries and publishing presses played a big part in the moderates seizing control of the SBC in the 50s/60s.
Of course, as we see on the national level, the homosexuals, a small portion of the population, are so easily spreading their propaganda, and people are falling for it left and right.
The apostasy will only get worse before it's all over.
True godliness is a sincere feeling which loves God as Father as much as it fears and reverences Him as Lord, embraces His righteousness, and dreads offending Him worse than death~ Calvin
I am sorry you received the impression that I meant heresy at the seminary. The seminary (RTS, Orlando) would be opposed to it with the present staff they have on board--NO heresy here TMK.
The professors here looking at the present state of affairs of the PCA and its growing liberal trends, etc. are saying it is app 10 years....(they know who the quite thinkers are; who though quiet for the present, know when to open their mouths so their message will be accepted by many..... ).
As stated above the problem is not at RTS. What is being taught for the most part is "right."--though I have a couple of issues (i.e. worship, where they "somewhat" model Frame's idea).
Where the problem(s) lie is in who gets ordained and thus has a voice in the GA. The more liberals that get into power the more the issue will begin to be raised in the public forum...(acording to some here there are many already in position...). Please do not think for a moment that liberals aren't at EVERY campus/church--some of the philosophy papers I have read <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/drop.gif" alt="" />
Many people don't understand how the homosexual movement could gain so much ground in such a short time. Even the homosexuals didn't expect so much progress as they are experiencing. Albert Mohler points out their agenda and some of the reasons for their success.
There can be no doubt that Christianity represents the greatest obstacle to the normalization of homosexual behavior. It cannot be otherwise, because of the clear biblical teachings concerning the inherent sinfulness of homosexuality in all forms, and the normativity of heterosexual marriage. In order to counter this obstacle, Kirk and Madsen advised gays to "use talk to muddy the moral waters, that is, to undercut the rationalizations that 'justify' religious bigotry and to jam some of its psychic rewards." How can this be done? "This entails publicizing support by moderate churches and raising serious theological objections to conservative biblical teachings. It also means exposing the inconsistency and hatred underlying antigay doctrines."
Conservative churches, defined by the authors as "homohating" are portrayed as "antiquated backwaters, badly out of step with the times and with the latest findings of psychology."
A quick review of the last 15 years demonstrates the incredible effectiveness of this public relations advice. The agenda set out by Kirk and Madsen led to nothing less than social transformation. By portraying themselves as mainstream Americans seeking nothing but liberty and self-fulfillment, homosexuals redefined the moral equation. Issues of right and wrong were isolated as outdated, repressive, and culturally embarrassing. Instead, the assertion of "rights" became the hallmark of the public relations strategy.
We all know that PCUSA has fallen away from biblical theology in recent years so it shouldn't shock us that they follow social trends and fail to recognize what the Bible has to say on this issue.
Wes
When I survey the wondrous cross on which the Prince of Glory died, my richest gain I count but loss and pour contempt on all my pride. - Isaac Watts
I agree whole heartily--great post. I read an article about 3-4 months ago that spoke of the laws and all changing so quickly to give everyone "human rights" that the church may have to go underground to live in the society. Their prediction was app. 50 years. 50 years is probably incorrect, but....The Church if it is not careful and pro-active may find itself outlawed in more than one sense of the term.
Apparently the PCUSA voted to not take this route for the moment, but the closeness of the vote does not leave me optimistic for the future:
Quote
Assembly votes to keep Authoritative Interpretation
By John H. Adams The Layman Online Friday, July 2, 2004 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- 2004 General Assembly Richmond, Virginia June 26-July 3, 2004 General Assembly news index RICHMOND, Va. – The national governing body of the Presbyterian Church (USA) decided Friday evening to continue prohibiting the ordination of self-acknowledged, unrepentant homosexuals – at least for two years.
The commissioners to the 216th General Assembly, on the next to the last day of their meeting in this historic town that was the capital of the South during the Civil War, voted 297 to 218 to do nothing to dismantle the "fidelity/chastity" ordination standard in the denomination's constitution or its theological underpinnings.
Precisely, the vote was an affirmation of a minority report signed by 18 members of the assembly's Committee on Church Orders and Ministry. The committee's majority had proposed that the commissioners nullify the status the Authoritative Interpretations of 1978 and 1979, which spelled out the Biblical basis for what later became the ordination law, G-6.0106b in the Book of Order.
In a series of votes, the commissioners rejected the committee's recommendation and adopted the minority report, which said the committee's recommendation would "significantly disturb the peace of the church, undermining the trust of our members at the very time when it is needed."
Instead, the minority report called for a continuing dialogue and commended the work of the Theological Task Force on Peace, Unity and Purity, which is charged with providing "discernment" on the issue. The task force will make its final report to the 217th General Assembly when it meets in Birmingham, Ala., in 2006.
The commissioners decided not to consider any of the overtures calling for repeal of G-6.0106b. Instead, their action in voting against the committee's recommendation covered all of the five overtures opposing the prohibition against ordaining practicing homosexuals.
Immediately after the vote Friday night, Moderator Rick Ufford-Chase met for prayer with advocates of changing the denomination's ordination standard. He announced before the vote that he would meet with Presbyterians on the losing side of the issue – no matter which side that was.
"Either way the debate goes, some of us are going to be deeply disappointed," he said. "As we finish, I would like to gather with those of you who are likely to be disappointed for a time of prayer. This is not a time of celebration, but rather a time to support one another."
Note: I've seen two different vote counts given--the one above, and another one that said the vote was 259-255, which is much closer. I have no idea which is correct.
The 259-255 vote put a minority report from Schaefer's committee before the assembly, supplanting the majority report that had recommended relaxing the gay ordination ban. Delegates then voted 297-218 to adopt the minority report, the only proposal before them.
It seems odd that the vote to consider the minority report was so close, and yet the gap to approve the minority report was so wide.
But listen to this other tidbit of news from the same article:
Quote
Also on Friday, Presbyterians overwhelmingly elected the Rev. Clifton Kirkpatrick as "stated clerk" — the chief executive at the church's Louisville, Ky., headquarters.
Kirkpatrick garnered 349 votes, 66 percent of the total, to defeat three conservatives who considered him too lax on enforcement of the church's gay leadership ban. Kirkpatrick was backed by the assembly's nominating committee.
So, I agree, Theo, that things won't stay this way for long.
True godliness is a sincere feeling which loves God as Father as much as it fears and reverences Him as Lord, embraces His righteousness, and dreads offending Him worse than death~ Calvin
Theo, thanks for the update!! <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/cheers2.gif" alt="" />
The fact that they even need to have a vote is indeed sad. I forget how many years the PCUSA has been slipping down the slippery slope of apostasy. They still have a "few" good members that are attempting to enact "true" reformed change in the denomination. The few I know though are really wondering how much time they have left (one pastor is thinking of going PCA if they will have him--though conservative himself, he has already met some resistance because of the PCUSA label). This is indeed a sad situation and one we need to pray about--and pray that its influence does not invade our churches....remember the SBC Church (McGill Baptist in NC) that was baptizing homosexuals in 2003 <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/scared.gif" alt="" />