Donations for the month of August


We have received a total of $220 in donations towards our goal of $175.


Don't want to use PayPal? Go HERE


Search

Member Spotlight
Posts: 2,836
Joined: September 2003
Show All Member Profiles 
Forum Statistics
Forums30
Topics6,478
Posts50,510
Members915
Most Online373
Mar 5th, 2017
Top Posters(All Time)
Pilgrim 13,237
Tom 3,226
chestnutmare 2,836
J_Edwards 2,615
Wes 1,856
John_C 1,738
RJ_ 1,582
MarieP 1,578
gotribe 1,057
Top Posters(30 Days)
Tom 45
Pilgrim 29
John_C 6
Recent Posts
White grape juice for the Lord's Supper?
by Meta4. Sun Aug 20, 2017 9:27 PM
Charlottesville Virginia and White Supremacy
by Tom. Sun Aug 20, 2017 6:02 PM
Martin Luther the Calvinist
by PerpetualLearner. Sun Aug 20, 2017 9:08 AM
A new translation - CSB
by PerpetualLearner. Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:05 AM
Introduction the this forum
by Tom. Mon Aug 14, 2017 9:41 PM
Am I living out the Gospel Message
by PerpetualLearner. Mon Aug 14, 2017 4:05 PM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Hop To
#53344 - Thu Mar 09, 2017 11:52 AM What is the Corrct Atonement view?  
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 441
JesusFan Offline
Addict
JesusFan  Offline
Addict

Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 441
Macomb Michigan
As now in discussion with someone who denies the penal substitution model, and instead like NT Wright view on Jesus as the Victor one? That God used his obedience to save us, and not poured out His wrath on Him?
Isn't the penal atonement view the one the reformers held to being as the correct viewpoint?

#53345 - Thu Mar 09, 2017 12:59 PM Re: What is the Corrct Atonement view? [Re: JesusFan]  
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,239
Pilgrim Offline
Head Honcho
Pilgrim  Offline

Head Honcho

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,239
NH, USA
I am wondering how you, after reading all those Reformed systematic theologies, don't know that the biblical doctrine of the atonement isn't penal?? From Genesis to Revelation, the atonement is revealed as being a forensic (legal) matter. The entire OT sacrificial system is based upon the law, its transgression and penalty upon those who don't keep it perfectly, etc. etc. There is an entire section on The Highway website dedicated to this subject HERE. Among the many articles there are several which address the "penal" aspect of the atonement, e.g., Packer's article, The Logic of Penal Substitution. grin


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
#53353 - Fri Mar 10, 2017 11:58 AM Re: What is the Corrct Atonement view? [Re: Pilgrim]  
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 441
JesusFan Offline
Addict
JesusFan  Offline
Addict

Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 441
Macomb Michigan
I did know that was the Biblical/reformed viewpoint, but also have interacted with others and have read authors like Wright who seem to be supporting other views?

#53354 - Fri Mar 10, 2017 12:15 PM Re: What is the Corrct Atonement view? [Re: JesusFan]  
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,239
Pilgrim Offline
Head Honcho
Pilgrim  Offline

Head Honcho

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,239
NH, USA
Originally Posted by JesusFan
I did know that was the Biblical/reformed viewpoint, but also have interacted with others and have read authors like Wright who seem to be supporting other views?

Really? Then why did you ask this question?:

Quote
Isn't the penal atonement view the one the reformers held to being as the correct viewpoint?

[Linked Image]


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
#53357 - Fri Mar 10, 2017 5:23 PM Re: What is the Corrct Atonement view? [Re: Pilgrim]  
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 441
JesusFan Offline
Addict
JesusFan  Offline
Addict

Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 441
Macomb Michigan
In ordewr to see how to respond to one holding to the NT Wright view on it?

#53359 - Fri Mar 10, 2017 7:03 PM Re: What is the Corrct Atonement view? [Re: JesusFan]  
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,239
Pilgrim Offline
Head Honcho
Pilgrim  Offline

Head Honcho

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,239
NH, USA
Originally Posted by JesusFan
In ordewr to see how to respond to one holding to the NT Wright view on it?

You respond with the biblical teaching of penal atonement. grin


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
#53360 - Sat Mar 11, 2017 10:39 AM Re: What is the Corrct Atonement view? [Re: Pilgrim]  
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 441
JesusFan Offline
Addict
JesusFan  Offline
Addict

Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 441
Macomb Michigan
Could you explain what they mean by God honoring Jesus as the Covenant keeper, by his active obedience he saves us, and not thry taking the wrath of God for sins?
As the person talking to on this issue keeps bring up that God used Jesus active obedience to the father to save us, and that God did not really abandon/forsake Him while on the cross?

Last edited by JesusFan; Sat Mar 11, 2017 10:44 AM.
#53362 - Sat Mar 11, 2017 12:02 PM Re: What is the Corrct Atonement view? [Re: JesusFan]  
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,239
Pilgrim Offline
Head Honcho
Pilgrim  Offline

Head Honcho

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,239
NH, USA
nope What I can tell you is that they totally reject the imputation of Christ's active obedience to the believing sinner which justifies once and for all time. simul iustus et peccatore


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
#53364 - Sat Mar 11, 2017 3:29 PM Re: What is the Corrct Atonement view? [Re: Pilgrim]  
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 441
JesusFan Offline
Addict
JesusFan  Offline
Addict

Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 441
Macomb Michigan
So how would God then be able to applying saving grace towards us without Jesus death in our place?

#53366 - Sat Mar 11, 2017 3:40 PM Re: What is the Corrct Atonement view? [Re: JesusFan]  
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,239
Pilgrim Offline
Head Honcho
Pilgrim  Offline

Head Honcho

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,239
NH, USA
Originally Posted by JesusFan
So how would God then be able to applying saving grace towards us without Jesus death in our place?

The imputation of Christ's active obedience has nothing to do with the death of Christ... that is the Passive Obedience of Christ vs. the Active Obedience of Christ.

Passive Obedience was Christ's vicarious, substitutionary atonement unto God to pay the penalty for sin; propitiation, redemption/ransom/, reconciliation, and sacrifice.

Active Obedience was Christ's keeping of the law perfectly, which showed He was without sin and thus was raised from the dead for our justification.

In Christ's passive obedience, the penalty for sin was imputed to Him (2Cor 5:21; Rom 5:12-18; Gal 2:20), but His active obedience (righteousness) is imputed to the believing elect.


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
#53383 - Tue Mar 14, 2017 10:44 AM Re: What is the Corrct Atonement view? [Re: Pilgrim]  
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 441
JesusFan Offline
Addict
JesusFan  Offline
Addict

Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 441
Macomb Michigan
They would then to overemphasize his active obedience at expense of His passive then. correct?

As person discussing this with would really avert away from wrath of God, being forsaken of God on the Cross, to found acceptable as the obedient servant of the Lord?

Last edited by JesusFan; Tue Mar 14, 2017 10:49 AM.
#53386 - Tue Mar 14, 2017 11:25 AM Re: What is the Corrct Atonement view? [Re: JesusFan]  
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,239
Pilgrim Offline
Head Honcho
Pilgrim  Offline

Head Honcho

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,239
NH, USA
Originally Posted by JesusFan
They would then to overemphasize his active obedience at expense of His passive then. correct?

As person discussing this with would really avert away from wrath of God, being forsaken of God on the Cross, to found acceptable as the obedient servant of the Lord?

I thought I had made this issue clear. shrug It is not a matter of "emphasis" but of total denial. FV and NPP along with their variants totally deny the IMPUTATION of Christ's active obedience. They redefine 'imputation' as they do to many other terms, e.g., faith, justification, etc. This is Justification 101. If you do not have a firm biblical understanding of what justification IS and what it MEANS, then you are going to have myriad problems trying to comprehend any and all heresies on this subject. This is why I told you several times to forget about reading the endless material written that teaches error. You FIRST need to know Scripture and what IT teaches and then saturate yourself with the writings of the godly orthodox men of the past; the Reformers and Puritans for a start.

When the Spirit regenerates a spiritually dead sinner, that person is given the insatiable desire to seek and grasp onto the PERSON of the Lord Christ via genuine heart-felt conviction of sin which expresses itself in repentance, and a true living faith (fiducia). At the moment this occurs, God declares that believer justified ONCE AND FOR ALL, i.e., the perfect righteousness of Christ (active obedience) is imputed to his account. Consequently, the sinner is legally not guilty and no longer under condemnation. But further, that believer is deemed to be perfectly righteousness legally. Luther's declaration is succinct: simul iustus et peccator (simultaneously [at the same time] just [perfectly righteous] and sinner.)


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
#53389 - Tue Mar 14, 2017 3:27 PM Re: What is the Corrct Atonement view? [Re: JesusFan]  
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 441
JesusFan Offline
Addict
JesusFan  Offline
Addict

Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 441
Macomb Michigan
What difference between their view and Rome take on God infusing His grace in us to have us to merit getting saved in the end?


Who's Online Now
1 registered members (John_C), 16 guests, and 95 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Petey Bad, Derwood, lynn, PerpetualLearner, TruthSeeker
915 Registered Users
Shout Box
August
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
Today's Birthdays
No Birthdays
Popular Topics(Views)
606,725 Gospel truth
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.046s Queries: 15 (0.002s) Memory: 2.6533 MB (Peak: 2.9663 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-08-21 15:56:30 UTC