Donations for the month of December


We have received a total of $25 in donations towards our goal of $175.


Don't want to use PayPal? Go HERE


Search

Member Spotlight
Tom
Tom
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 3,563
Joined: April 2001
Show All Member Profiles 
Forum Statistics
Forums30
Topics6,717
Posts51,530
Members932
Most Online373
Mar 5th, 2017
Top Posters(All Time)
Pilgrim 13,540
Tom 3,563
chestnutmare 2,931
J_Edwards 2,615
Wes 1,856
John_C 1,773
RJ_ 1,582
MarieP 1,578
gotribe 1,060
Top Posters(30 Days)
Tom 7
Tina 2
Recent Posts
The Godly Man
by chestnutmare. Mon Dec 17, 2018 7:05 AM
Abortion and Politics
by Pilgrim. Tue Dec 11, 2018 6:42 AM
Is the Following Legit?
by goldenoldie. Sun Dec 09, 2018 8:00 AM
None but Christ!
by chestnutmare. Fri Dec 07, 2018 2:01 PM
Chau is no Jim Elliot
by Tom. Thu Dec 06, 2018 12:13 AM
Build Thy spiritual temple among us
by chestnutmare. Mon Dec 03, 2018 5:53 AM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
Guilt or Innocence Does it Matter? #55237
Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:55 PM
Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:55 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,563
Kelowna, British Columbia, Can...
Tom Offline OP
Needs to get a Life
Tom  Offline OP
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,563
Kelowna, British Columbia, Can...
I think the following link is worth posting here; both for information and discussion.
http://www.dennyburk.com/does-guilt-or-innocence-even-matter-anymore/

Here is an excerpt from the article.
Quote
I have to say that this is the worst argument I believe I have ever read from Douthat, and it is disappointing. How can it not matter whether Kavanaugh is guilty or innocent? It seems to me that his guilt or innocence is the most important question to be answered in assessing his nomination. And yet, Douthat says that even if he is innocent, Kavanaugh's nomination might very well deserve to fail. It's an incredible claim.

I think the claim is very scary; because if the argument that guilt or innocence does not matter. All one needs to do is make an allegation against someone running for office; or in this case being nominated, then you have essentially disqualified the person for the position.

Tom

Re: Guilt or Innocence Does it Matter? [Re: Tom] #55239
Wed Sep 26, 2018 6:10 AM
Wed Sep 26, 2018 6:10 AM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,540
NH, USA
Pilgrim Offline

Head Honcho
Pilgrim  Offline

Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,540
NH, USA
Originally Posted by Tom

I think the claim is very scary; because if the argument that guilt or innocence does not matter. All one needs to do is make an allegation against someone running for office; or in this case being nominated, then you have essentially disqualified the person for the position.

Most all the conservative radio talk show hosts, e.g. Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Mark Steyn, Mark Levin, et al have been hammering this point for a couple of weeks now on their respective shows. The fundamental problem is what one can now expect out of the majority of "Progressive Democrats" (read Socialists/Communists) in America... a total disregard and hatred of the Constitution of the United States. The presumption of innocence is a basic belief that has been around for millennia and worldwide among various nations. The 6th Amendment of the Constitution of the U.S. guarantees specific rights which are guaranteed to citizens which are accused of a crime and which stand upon one's presumption of innocence.

The guilt of innocence of Brett Kavanaugh is not to be determined by an accusation, nor by public opinion, nor by Hollywood personalities, nor by the media, but by a court of law. There is such a blatant "dual standard" in politics that it should not surprise anyone that Kavanaugh is being crucified by the Democrats and the main street media. Where was the outcry and lynch mob for Ted Kennedy and his brothers for their crimes, even murder? Or how about the infamous Bill Clinton and his torrid affairs and raping of women? etc.

Quote
John 8:6,7 "[6] This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not. [7] So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her."


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
Re: Guilt or Innocence Does it Matter? [Re: Tom] #55260
Thu Oct 04, 2018 10:20 AM
Thu Oct 04, 2018 10:20 AM
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3
The South
grit Offline
Plebeian
grit  Offline
Plebeian
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3
The South
It's been a while since I posted, so it may be wise to start by affirming my agreement.

I do think it gives us talking points as a nation and then as Christians that merit thorough discussion. In looking around on a few sites that largely reflect liberal Atheist and conservative Christian viewpoints there can be little doubt that liberals oppose Judge Kavanaugh's confirmation sincerely and ardently enough for some to even propose and encourage violence in championing their agenda, and conservatives support Judge Kavanaugh's confirmation sincerely and ardently enough for some to even champion his confirmation were Dr. Blasey Ford's allegations true (though of this “some” sample there's a distinguishing between characterising the alleged behaviour as attempted rape and manslaughter, or viewing them as druken high-school campy horseplay). Those are the extremes. The question then becomes that for folk between those extremes, to what degree ought a SCOTUS nominee's personal and professional histories be determinant of both their worthiness to represent all the people of the nation and to do so with a moral clarity and comportment reflective of national expectation.

What I've heard from liberals is that Judge Kavanaugh is “evil” and evil ought to be eradicated and especially precluded from the SCOTUS – that having this evil on the Court will do irreparable harm to the nation. And, in any case, that Judge Kavanaugh cannot possibly represent them with any degree of fairness or non-partisan justice.

What I've heard from conservatives is more of a mixed bag, but on the guilt/innocence issue those believing Judge Kavanaugh largely claim his innocence establishes his moral worthiness to the Court, and his record in jurisprudence establishes his fairness in representing all the people of our nation.

However, among conservatives there seems also to be a noticeable group of folk giving a heavy ponder to this last part of the hearing and accentuated claims from others earlier regarding Judge Kavanaugh's temperament and seemingly partisan remarks directed to the Democrats. This speaks to what the OP reflects on the linked article.
Quote
Douthat makes the case that it doesn’t really matter whether Judge Brett Kavanaugh is guilty or innocent of the allegations against him. Even if Kavanaugh is innocent, he has been tainted by accusations made against him and on those grounds alone could be unfit to serve on the Supreme Court.


Quote
Even if Kavanaugh is innocent of the charge of a teenage sexual assault… to give such prominence and power to a man credibly accused would both leave an unnecessary taint on his future rulings (especially given his appointment by our Playboy president) and alienate social conservatives from the persuadable Americans, women especially, whose support any pro-life program ultimately requires


It's striking to me just how much the current debacle reflects that of the confirmation of Justice Clarence Thomas to the SCOTUS. While Democrat Sen. And Committee Chairman Joe Biden opposed and voted against Justice Thomas on policy, other Democrats indeed expressed that Justice Thomas would be too tainted by allegations of sexual misconduct to effectively serve on the Court.

I heartily agree that mere allegations ought in no way influence or effect appropriateness to serve or effectiveness of performance. Further, while I would personally be uncomfortable with a drunk or lush or alcoholic on the bench, and equally uncomfortable with someone who may have done something somewhere in high-school or college that was sexually inappropriate, those demographics represent a very large segment of the American people and American culture. To me, inappropriate juvenile behaviour is not and should not be an automatic disqualification, even to the highest court of the land. The “casting stones” wisdom remains, even considering King David's record of adultery, murder, and redemptive restoration. Did King David remain in struggle with the consequences of his repented actions? Yes, he did. Did they remove or disqualify him from service? No, they did not, not with repentance.

I realise too, the angle toward just picking some other unstained nominee out of the bag, but hey, this has become the new normal – delay and destroy the competition by any means necessary. That sort of strategy ought never be rewarded, whether of Democrats or Republicans. We shouldn't as a nation or as Christians be looking for ways to enact treason against our President, even if or when we think it's in our nation's best interests. It's maybe too modern and common a phrase to sink in for some, but, "One nation, under God. with liberty and justice for all" is something to which I think Judge Kavanaugh remains steadfastly committed.

In college we studied Richard Niebuhr's 5 classic Christian Christ-culture options trying to untangle messy debates on living in the world. The thought proposed by Douthat is that in saving a persuadable culture toward Christian value(s) we ought not to needlessly confront them directly with pure contrast and certainly not belligerently in stark prior distance from agreement and acceptability with them. Christ though, calls us to be salt and light, a preserving beacon of hope toward redemption. While it's most certainly true that God came to Earth and tabernacled among us as one of us, it's equally true that He did not compromise nor withdraw His service from being thought either a prude or a fraud. That He was tainted by false allegations thankfully did not dissuade Him from all needed loving service on our behalf. Neither ought such challenge dissuade or disqualify Judge Kavanaugh.


Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 30 guests, and 102 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Ronald Bargebo, mottley, SnydersSoapbox, Susan, reformedbygrace
932 Registered Users
Shout Box
December
S M T W T F S
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31
Today's Birthdays
Christ_My_Savior
Popular Topics(Views)
862,084 Gospel truth
Page Time: 0.047s Queries: 15 (0.002s) Memory: 2.8336 MB (Peak: 3.1024 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2018-12-18 21:56:16 UTC