Donations for the month of June


We have received a total of "$25" in donations towards our goal of $175.


Don't want to use PayPal? Go HERE


Search

Member Spotlight
Tom
Tom
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 3,831
Joined: April 2001
Show All Member Profiles 
Forum Statistics
Forums30
Topics7,039
Posts52,440
Members946
Most Online523
Jan 14th, 2020
Top Posters(All Time)
Pilgrim 13,783
Tom 3,831
chestnutmare 3,036
J_Edwards 2,615
Wes 1,856
John_C 1,799
RJ_ 1,582
MarieP 1,579
gotribe 1,060
Top Posters(30 Days)
Pilgrim 11
Tom 3
Recent Posts
The Mute Christian Under The Smarting Rod
by Rick Bates. Wed Jun 03, 2020 8:39 PM
Matthew 12:40
by rstrats. Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:44 PM
"The Sinfulness of Sin" by WTG Shedd
by Pilgrim. Mon Jun 01, 2020 7:32 AM
Total Depravity
by Pilgrim. Sun May 31, 2020 8:26 PM
The Keys Of Death Are In The Savior's Hands
by Rick Bates. Sat May 30, 2020 2:05 PM
Justification And Preaching
by Rick Bates. Mon May 25, 2020 7:33 PM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
Supralapsarianism and Infralapsarianism Compared ~ From Monergism #56178
Sat Apr 18, 2020 7:51 PM
Sat Apr 18, 2020 7:51 PM
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 117
Charlestown, R.I. US
Rick Bates Offline OP
Member
Rick Bates  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 117
Charlestown, R.I. US
What do the terms “supralapsarianism,” and “infralapsarianism” mean, and does the bible teach one or the other?

The terms“supralapsarianism,” and “infralapsarianism” (sometimes called “sublapsarianism”) have to do with the logical order of God's eternal decrees of salvation. The question, basically, is this: did God's decree to save a certain people come before (supra) or after (infra) his decree to permit the fall (laps). Infralapsarians argue that, in order not to charge God with injustice or sin, it is necessary that God's election of men to salvation be made from a field of men who are sinners already; hence, the decree to ordain the fall must logically come before the decree to elect men to salvation. Otherwise, in ordaining to destruction men who had not yet fallen, the charge could be made against God that he was responsible for their sin and rebellion, which his eternal plan demanded of them. But no, the supralapsarian responds, God's eternal plan to redeem some and not others from the outset, while requiring sin and the Fall, does not logically make God culpable, and furthermore, it better fits the biblical evidence of God's prerogative to use evil for the accomplishment of his prior designs. God's ultimate purpose for creation and redemptive history is the triumph of the Lamb both in the destruction of his enemies and the salvation of his people; and this plan logically requires the existence of sin, and also of God's triumph over that sin through righteous judgment and sovereign mercy. If God's ultimate purpose in history is the display of his glory in the person and work of Christ; and if the manifold glory of Christ includes righteous wrath against sin; then God's eternal purpose of redemption necessitated the Fall, and did not just respond to it.

The basic schema of infralapsarianism and supralapsarianism may be displayed as follows:
Infralapsarianism
1. the decree to create the world and (all) men
2. the decree that (all) men would fall
3. the election of some fallen men to salvation in Christ (and the reprobation of the others)
4. the decree to redeem the elect by the cross work of Christ
5. the decree to apply Christ's redemptive benefits to the elect

Supralapsarianism (historical)
1. the election of some men to salvation in Christ (and the reprobation of the others)
2. the decree to create the world and both kinds of men
3. the decree that all men would fall
4. the decree to redeem the elect, who are now sinners, by the cross work of Christ
5. the decree to apply Christ's redemptive benefits to these elect sinners
These lists display the traditional understandings of the lapsarian question. However, recent theologians have noted that neither list accurately depicts the logical way in which all reasonable creatures pursue their goals: first, they determine what they ultimately and primarily want, and then they walk backwards, as it were, through all the steps necessary to get there. If God's ultimate goal is the glory of the Lamb in sovereign mercy and righteous judgment, then there is a need for sinners; if there are to be sinners, there must be a fall; if there is a fall, there must be a world created in righteousness; hence, the logical order of God's decrees would be a modified supralapsarianism, as follows:

Supralapsarianism (modified)
1. the election of some men to salvation in Christ (and the reprobation of the rest of sinful
mankind in order to make known the riches of God's gracious mercy to the elect)
2. the decree to apply Christ's redemptive benefits to the elect sinners
3. the decree to redeem the elect sinners by the cross work of Christ
4. the decree that men should fall
5. the decree to create the world and men
In any discussion of the lapsarian debate, it should be emphasized what all the views have in common: and that is, that God decreed all the events of his eternal redemption from before the creation of the world. Logically, perhaps, the last scheme is the most defensible; however, no position should be so heartily embraced as to be made binding upon men's consciences; the scriptures do not address the topic clearly enough for so firm an adherence. Perhaps a story from the life of Martin Luther would be instructive here: when some inquisitive theologian asked him what God was doing before he created the world, Luther quipped, “He was busy creating hell for foolish theologians who pry into such questions”. The response is a little tongue-in-cheek, of course, but perhaps there is some wisdom in it, particularly when we are addressing the lapsarian question.

[All of the above lists are taken from Robert L. Reymond, A New Systematic Theology of the Christian Faith (Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1998), pp. 479-489.]




Monergism Copyright © 2008


Further Reading ~ Development of the Doctrine of Predestination - Herman Bavinck






Last edited by Pilgrim; Sat Apr 18, 2020 9:07 PM. Reason: fixed link to Bavinck article
Re: Supralapsarianism and Infralapsarianism Compared ~ From Monergism [Re: Rick Bates] #56180
Sat Apr 18, 2020 9:55 PM
Sat Apr 18, 2020 9:55 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,783
NH, USA
Pilgrim Offline

Head Honcho
Pilgrim  Offline

Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,783
NH, USA
Originally Posted by Robert Raymond
These lists display the traditional understandings of the lapsarian question. However, recent theologians have noted that neither list accurately depicts the logical way in which all reasonable creatures pursue their goals: first, they determine what they ultimately and primarily want, and then they walk backwards, as it were, through all the steps necessary to get there.

The problem with that statement is two-fold and probably more....

1) It foolishly rejects how the minds of the Church's greatest 'notables' read, interpreted and applied God's inspired written Word. The "logical way" used by these gifted men which God raised up for the systematization and preservation of His truth was the same, albeit they sometimes disagreed with their conclusions of certain doctrines, e.g., the "supra" vs "infra" debate, which is strictly an in house matter.

2. It seems to have forgotten that ALL men are fallen and prone to err, especially when they rely upon their own understanding (cf. Job 38:36; Psa 111:10, 119:34, 119:99; Prov 3:5,13; et al), for knowledge, understanding and wisdom are given of God in Christ through the Scriptures by the indwelling Spirit (cf. Col 1:9,10, 2:6-10). Far too many "theologians" are enamored with themselves and seek the praises of men by dreaming up something "new" which will set themselves apart from other men and be deemed "special", "scholars", ad nauseum. Remember this one sad fact.... the overwhelming majority of heresies of all stripes have come through Doctors, theologians, professors, teachers and pastor/teachers. Rarely will one find a heresy introduced and accepted by men and the visible church by a 'layman'. scratchchin

Lastly, most all of the official "Confessions" which came out of the Reformation either explicitly or implicitly side with the Infralapsarian view. I could write more of the perils of the Supralapsarian view, but I do not believe it would be helpful at this juncture. grin


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 46 guests, and 85 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
David Clarke, CharlieFry, Michaelpatrick, ROB, Rick Bates
946 Registered Users
Shout Box
June
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
Today's Birthdays
No Birthdays
Popular Topics(Views)
1,086,586 Gospel truth
Page Time: 0.047s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 2.8224 MB (Peak: 3.0818 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2020-06-04 08:37:20 UTC