Quote
geomic1 said:
Kyle,
The pecca…people, don’t want to discuss, the rationale that there really can’t be an “ability to sin” if there is no real possibility of it happening.

Your logic is as bad as the logic of the Arminians. You would have us believe that Adam was incapable of continuing in obedience! Was he? No, he was not. He was completely capable of continuing in obedience, but God decreed that he should fall, and so Adam fell. Human responsibility AND divine decree.

Quote
I believe that Jesus’ temptation was mainly external. . . . Our temptations always start out internal (James 1:14), when we are bombarded by the external, that is why I believe He was incapable of sinning, internally His mind was not neutral like with Adam, His will was to be obedient from the start (God’s foreknowledge), our will is to be disobedient from the start, because we are not neutral either (2Cor.2:14), but our will (prior to conversion) is the antithesis of our Savior.

Adam's mind was NOT neutral! God said that Adam was GOOD. And no one has suggested that Jesus was tempted by His own lusts.

Kyle

I tell you, this man went down to his house justified.