Donations for the month of December |
We have received a total of "50" in donations towards our goal of $175.
|
Don't want to use PayPal? Go HERE
|
|
|
Posts: 1,859
Joined: September 2001
|
|
|
Forums30
Topics7,742
Posts54,754
Members974
|
Most Online732 Jan 15th, 2023
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,419 Likes: 55
Head Honcho
|
OP
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,419 Likes: 55 |
Who decides what is essential and what is non-essential? Good question. So what would be your answer? Aha, answering a question with a question. :cool: I don't know if that means you don't have an answer, but here's mine. There was much dispute in the early church about whether or not it was essential to be circumcised (and avoid pork etc.) in order to be Christian. A council was convened, a decision was reached, and then Paul and Timothy were sent to the cities to tell the people to obey the decrees. So, the visible church decides. That's my answer. Oh, but I do have an answer. The Lord Christ sometimes answered a question with a question, so it seemed good in this case that I followed suit.  1. Re: your answer: Unfortunately, the visible Church consists of myriad and varied members, some of whom are not even regenerated. Thus, this begs the further question, Who in the visible church does one trust? The situation which evoked this question is paradigmatic. One part of the visible church has decreed that homosexuals are qualified to hold the office of elder and deacon. Another part has decreed that women are qualified to serve in both offices. But many others have decreed that neither are qualified.  2. Now for my answer. As you probably anticipated, I believe that God's inspired, infallible, inerrant, written Word is the final arbitrator in all such matters of doctrine and life. It is the Holy Spirit who leads those who are Christ's to the truth. Another hypothetical question: What if whoever/whatever you think has the authority to determine what is essential and non-essential declared that the Trinity, or the deity of Christ or the sacraments or the perpetual virginity of Mary or that homosexuality is non-essential. Would you acknowledge that decision and embrace it?  Well, that would never happen in an official and binding way. It's a false dilemma. That is to say, it was not possible that the Jerusalem Council would declare that it was essential for Gentiles to be circumcised and then send Paul and Timothy to tell everyone to obey that false decree as a matter of dogma. In the same manner, it would simply be impossible for the Jerusalem Council to bind the faithful to believe in Unitarianism or gay marriage etc. Would you not agree? In the same manner, it is simply not possible to bind the faithful today to deny the Trinity, the deity of Christ, the PVM, or to deny that homosexuality is disordered. The problem I have with this suggestion is that 1) The Jerusalem Council is irrelevant to the issue at hand. It was a gathering of the Apostles during the infant stage of the Church wherein decisions had to be made in regard to the inclusion of the Gentiles in matters of the ceremonial law and justification by faith alone. Once the Church as an organization was established (cf. Eph 4:10-16), those called to serve in the office of Elder, Presbyter, Bishop, were to preach, teach, and maintain doctrine according to what they had been taught according to the Scriptures. 2) Church councils since that time; I'm including the modern councils of Synods, General Assemblies and such, have erred, do err and will continue to err in their declarations as evidenced by the two abhorrent declarations referenced above. Members of those respective churches/denominations have given their assent to the authority of those bodies and are bound to acknowledge them through their obedience. HOWEVER, they are only obligated to render obedience as far as they are faithful to the Scriptures. This obedience is seen to be universal in scope and application in all spheres of life; e.g., children to parents, wives to husbands, citizens to their governing authorities, etc. When such authorities demand that which is contrary to the teaching of Scripture, then they are not obligated to render obedience. Likewise, where such authorities forbid that which God requires in the Scriptures, then such decrees/requirements are to be ignored.
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Pilgrim
|
Sat Jun 11, 2011 9:17 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Johan
|
Mon Jun 13, 2011 4:34 AM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Pilgrim
|
Mon Jun 13, 2011 9:47 AM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
chestnutmare
|
Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:02 AM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Reformation Monk
|
Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:05 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Reformation Monk
|
Mon Jun 13, 2011 12:27 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
via_dolorosa
|
Mon Jun 13, 2011 2:28 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Reformation Monk
|
Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:14 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Pilgrim
|
Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:06 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Reformation Monk
|
Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:45 AM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Pilgrim
|
Tue Jun 14, 2011 3:04 AM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Tom
|
Tue Jun 14, 2011 5:22 AM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Reformation Monk
|
Tue Jun 14, 2011 11:22 AM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Pilgrim
|
Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:14 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
CovenantInBlood
|
Fri Jun 17, 2011 6:38 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Newman
|
Thu Jun 16, 2011 8:31 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Pilgrim
|
Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:58 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Newman
|
Thu Jun 16, 2011 11:32 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Pilgrim
|
Fri Jun 17, 2011 12:07 AM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
via_dolorosa
|
Tue Jun 14, 2011 4:56 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
John_C
|
Sun Jun 19, 2011 2:55 AM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Pilgrim
|
Sun Jun 19, 2011 2:11 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
John_C
|
Sun Jun 19, 2011 6:31 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Pilgrim
|
Sun Jun 19, 2011 7:10 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
John_C
|
Mon Jun 20, 2011 10:05 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Pilgrim
|
Mon Jun 20, 2011 11:02 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
John_C
|
Tue Jun 21, 2011 12:32 AM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Johan
|
Thu Jun 23, 2011 5:29 AM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Tom
|
Tue Jun 21, 2011 1:14 AM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
John_C
|
Tue Jun 21, 2011 1:31 AM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Tom
|
Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:21 AM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Newman
|
Tue Jun 21, 2011 9:06 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Pilgrim
|
Tue Jun 21, 2011 9:17 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Newman
|
Wed Jun 22, 2011 3:48 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Pilgrim
|
Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:46 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
john
|
Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:14 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Pilgrim
|
Fri Jun 24, 2011 11:57 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
john
|
Mon Jun 27, 2011 3:58 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Newman
|
Mon Jun 27, 2011 9:16 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
AC.
|
Tue Jun 28, 2011 12:42 AM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Newman
|
Tue Jun 28, 2011 4:05 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
AC.
|
Tue Jun 28, 2011 5:20 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Newman
|
Tue Jun 28, 2011 9:51 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
AC.
|
Wed Jun 29, 2011 1:06 AM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
CovenantInBlood
|
Wed Jun 29, 2011 5:08 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Newman
|
Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:29 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Newman
|
Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:35 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
CovenantInBlood
|
Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:14 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Newman
|
Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:48 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Newman
|
Fri Jul 01, 2011 10:59 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Pilgrim
|
Sat Jul 02, 2011 2:31 AM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
AC.
|
Sun Jul 24, 2011 3:23 AM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Newman
|
Wed Jul 27, 2011 11:51 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
AC.
|
Thu Jul 28, 2011 1:03 AM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Newman
|
Thu Jul 28, 2011 4:50 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Robin
|
Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:35 AM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
CovenantInBlood
|
Thu Jun 30, 2011 7:46 PM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
Pilgrim
|
Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:43 AM
|
Re: The Suicide of a Denomination
|
John_C
|
Wed Jun 22, 2011 1:30 AM
|
|
|
0 members (),
77
guests, and
14
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|