Originally Posted by Greg Bowman
Doesn't John MacArthur attack on the A-Mill view as he did at the sheppard's conference and kim riddlebarger's responce, show that JM's dispy hit's at the gospel?
Greg....

Welcome to the Discussion Board. [Linked Image]

I am going to assume that you have already concluded that MacArthur's [progressive] Dispensationalism "hit's at the gospel" and therefore, I'm interested in knowing how. Can you provide what you think are valid examples of how his Dispy view/hermeneutic changes the gospel?

Thanks. grin


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]