Donations for the month of October

We have received a total of "$0" in donations towards our goal of $175.

Don't want to use PayPal? Go HERE

Forum Search
Member Spotlight
Posts: 14,044
Joined: April 2001
Forum Statistics
Most Online523
Jan 14th, 2020
Top Posters
Pilgrim 14,043
Tom 4,044
chestnutmare 3,086
J_Edwards 2,615
Wes 1,856
John_C 1,818
RJ_ 1,583
MarieP 1,579
gotribe 1,060
Top Posters(30 Days)
Pilgrim 23
Tom 9
Robin 5
Johan 3
Readin 2
Recent Posts
The Nick-name Calvinism
by Pilgrim - Sat Oct 23, 2021 12:13 PM
Natural Theology
by Anthony C. - Fri Oct 22, 2021 11:47 AM
Wilderness Wealth
by NetChaplain - Fri Oct 22, 2021 10:57 AM
Your opinion please
by Johan - Thu Oct 21, 2021 1:03 AM
True of False
by NetChaplain - Wed Oct 20, 2021 5:26 PM
Natural Theology 2
by Pilgrim - Tue Oct 19, 2021 10:41 PM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
#56810 Thu Jun 24, 2021 10:03 AM
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 97
OP Offline
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 97
"If your proclamation of the law is not to drive people to seek the election of the Father you are preaching damnable heresy. So the question is, how does proclaiming the law drive the elect sinner to seek the solution of the Father? Get this wrong and get everything wrong. This is what the antinomians and legalists miss."

Does this quote appear to express the view of the hyper-Calvinist that only the elect have warrant to believe upon Christ? In other words, one must first ascertain if one is elect before the "right" is given to repentant and believe unto justification.

Whereas the Biblical view would be that Christ promises to save all who come to Him in faith.

Last edited by ATulipNotADaisy; Thu Jun 24, 2021 10:41 AM.
ATulipNotADaisy #56812 Thu Jun 24, 2021 10:44 AM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,044
Likes: 13
Head Honcho
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,044
Likes: 13
yep This is a "classic" hyper-Calvinism statement. That is what was being taught, for example, at the Protestant Reformed Seminary in the early '80s. I have no reason to believe that things have changed since then. "Only the elect have the warrant/right to believe" is totally unbiblical. Everyone, without exception has the warrant/right to believe. And, equally biblical is that only the elect have the ability to believe.

The biggest caveat and unsurmountable problem with the doctrine of "only the elect have the warrant to believe" is how can a spiritually DEAD sinner discern that they are one of the elect? Even true believers at times have difficulty with that kind of assurance. The fact is, only God knows who are the elect since He predestined them and elected them to Christ in eternity. There is no biblical evidence that guarantees any human being can infallibly know who the elect are. The Gospel is promiscuous. No one is exempt from the proclamation of the Gospel, because it is the Spirit working through it that the elect are called to faith as they are regenerated and given the desire and ability to repent and believe.

[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
1 members (Meta4), 108 guests, and 25 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
atdcross, NetChaplain, winslowlady, Zach, Daverogk
964 Registered Users
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Popular Topics(Views)
1,294,119 Gospel truth