Donations for the month of October |
We have received a total of "0" in donations towards our goal of $175.
|
Don't want to use PayPal? Go HERE
|
|
|
Posts: 1,858
Joined: September 2001
|
|
|
Forums30
Topics7,729
Posts54,708
Members974
|
Most Online732 Jan 15th, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RFK Jr.
by Pilgrim - Thu Sep 14, 2023 6:56 PM
|
|
|
#58706
Wed Sep 13, 2023 10:49 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,858
Permanent Resident
|
OP
Permanent Resident
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,858 |
For the past 40 years or so, I've read through 1 and 2 Corinthians once or twice a year in my NT quiet times. I cannot specifically say why, but the early chapters of the two books seem different in the phrasing of the text than with the other Pauline epistles.
Is their a reason why, or am I just 'out to lunch' on this? Are their any epistles that you find somethat different than the others?
John Chaney
"having been firmly rooted and now being built up in Him and established in your faith . . ." Colossians 2:7
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,408 Likes: 55
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,408 Likes: 55 |
Just curious why the question? Is Pauline authorship being questioned...?
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,858
Permanent Resident
|
OP
Permanent Resident
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,858 |
No, not at all. It's just that with the other Paul's epistles, I find the teaching easy to understand, but with the two Corinthians books, I have to do a double-take in what is he teaching here. Mostly in the early chapters of the two books.
Someone mention to me that the reason may be that Paul is defending himself in the two books unlike the others.
John Chaney
"having been firmly rooted and now being built up in Him and established in your faith . . ." Colossians 2:7
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
45
guests, and
20
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
|