What would be the difference between the dual prophecy mentioned by Michelle, and what Hendriksen's states:

Quote
By the process of prophetic foreshortening, by means of which before one's eyes the widely separated mountain peaks of historic events merge and are seen as one, as has been explained with 10:23 and 16:28, two momentous events are here intertwined, namely, a. the judgment upon Jerusalem (its fall in the year A.D. 70, and b. the final judgement at the close of the world's history. Our Lord predicts the city's approaching catastrophe as a type of the tribulation at the end of the dispensation. . .


Hendriksen's disputes the preterist position in his commentary.

How would Henriksen be classified? I'm sure a amill, but would he be an historicist as well?

My Pastor uses the separated mountain peaks a lot.

John Chaney

"having been firmly rooted and now being built up in Him and established in your faith . . ." Colossians 2:7