|

|
|
|
Posts: 117
Joined: July 2025
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,348
Posts56,543
Members992
| |
Most Online2,383 Jan 12th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274 |
Tom, going off-topic, asks: Rev 20:2 of course is not so obvious however. I am interested in what clues in the text & context you see that shows the reader what way 1000 years is to be taken. The "1000 years" found in Rev. 20 seems to some of us to be more than clear that it is not to be taken "literally", for to do so would create insurmountable problems in understanding many of the other things mentioned there, e.g., Was Satan bound with a "literal" chain? Was he cast into a "literal" bottomless pit (can you describe that from a literal hermeneutic)?, etc. Anyway.. this is ![[Linked Image]](http://www.the-highway.com/Smileys/OffTopic.gif) and thus if you want to continue with this issue, please begin a new thread. ![[Linked Image]](http://www.the-highway.com/Smileys/biggrinking.gif) In His Grace,
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
219
guests, and
34
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|