OK, I'm off topic, but I couldn't resist furthering Linda's great observation here!<br><br>Interestingly enough, when I was an atheist, I was still anti-abortion. I guess all that Roman Catholic upbringing did me some "good"!<br>One day I was in a discussion with an environmentalist. She was talking about just how evil it was to destroy bird's eggs, and how great it was that it was illegal to destroy the eggs of an eagle.<br>I said, that is great, and then you are obviously pro-life! She looked stunned, and said, no, of course she was in favor of a woman's right to choose. In my typical graceful style (sarcasm intended), I countered by asking her why it was wrong to destroy an eagle egg, but OK to destroy a human life. She said, without blinking, "Because humans aren't endangered". I finally said, "But each child that is murdered is an individual, and thus, in a sense, IS endangered"<br>You see, in her wicked mind, a human soul was equivalent to a bird. The reason it was OK to kill a human and not an eagle is because of the arbitrary definition of endangered. <br><br>Steve

Grace is not common.