I believe if you read what I actually wrote, I agree that the issue of being taken off "life-support" is a moot issue in this case, since there appeared to be, albeit scant information in that one initial article that said the woman does communicate, which alone is sufficient to show that her ex-husband's attempts to deny her sustenance is unethical and contrary to what we as Christians hold to be true. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />

My intention was simply to affirm to averagefellar that in situations where one is indeed on full life-support, it should be stopped IF it was the person's own desire beforehand that they not be put on full life-support. I agree with averagefellar that the courts and/or bureacrats, nor even my family have no business in determining my end in this specific situation when my clear wishes have been previously made known.

[Linked Image]


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]