Fred,

Being a staunch presuppositionalist, I am in full agreement with you over the soteriological insufficiency of the reported "admission", and was not trying to imply other than that some now claim that Flew is a Deist. Your source certainly calls even that claim into question. In fairness to the WHI interview, it was made quite clear that Flew remains antagonistic toward the Living God.

While I hope for this man's sake that he will be converted by sovereign grace to saving faith in Christ, if he remains in his current state of rebellion--which is at the root of all unbelief--he is no nearer to God than the demons, who are quite thoroughly convinced Deists.

In Christ,
Paul S