Quote
Pilgrim said:

However, unlike some, I can accept those who hold to a "Dispy-Lite" form of Dispensationalism, e.g., John MacArthur &co. I simply cannot put that position in the same camp with Classic Dispensationalism, although I certainly reject it on it's own demerits.

Are you saying that this dispy-lite form (of eschatology) in your opinion is an acceptable form of hermeneutics, or to say it slightly blunter, that those adhering to it could be, possibly, correct or right? Or are you just saying that they aren't necessarily wrong?

Sorry if I sound a bit confusing here. I have heard that MacArthur adheres to some kind of dispensationalism, which as a matter of fact I found very surprising.

In Christ
Jim