|

|
|
|
Posts: 706
Joined: May 2016
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,351
Posts56,547
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295 Yesterday at 09:40 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 12
Plebeian
|
OP
Plebeian
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 12 |
Hi Tom Well, we're fortunate. He appears to be a prolific commentator on John 6:37 he writes: Happily, however, there would be those who would respond. ‘All whom the Father gives to me will come to me.’ It is impossible to avoid here the suggestion that in the end those who truly come do so because the Father chooses them out, for the ‘giving’ is before the ‘coming’. John continually quite clearly depicts the difference between those whose faith is temporary and based on the emotion of a moment, and those whose faith is permanent and lasting, and he sees Jesus as demonstrating that this results from the work of the Father. It is because they have been given to Him by the Father.
‘And the one who comes to me I will not reject for any reason whatsoever’. Once a man has been called by God and responds there is not the slightest chance of his being rejected, for he is part of the Father’s gift to His Son. For Romans 9 I can't say as he apparently hasn't written a commentary on that epistle yet. But I give the link to the pages that gives access to all his other commentaries. http://www.geocities.com/revelationofjohn/index.htmlI personally was impressed with his commentary on Daniel's seventieth week and Revelation 7 on the 144.000 sealed. He appears to follow Hendriksen in his eschatology. in His grace Jim
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
107
guests, and
27
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|