The Highway Forums General Discussion Open Forum Evangelical Reformed Presbyterian

Kim & Pilgrim

I'm not saying that we should just put our heads in the sand on aberrant teaching, but FV, AA, NPP is not where the fight lies. Theonomy is driving these teachings. I'm still not completely understanding the link between FV & AA with that of NPP except that the ahderents supports NPP to some degree. Therefore, IMO it is mostly intramural in-fighting amongst Theonomists. My guess is that the churches forming the new denomination has strong Theonomic ties, and their old comrades are going astray. The present fight in the PCA, besides cultural liberalism affecting the church (which will be ultimately its demise), is between those with Theonomy-leanings and those who do not. I don't know exactly what to call the majority side. What seminaries are you referring that are having difficulties with these theologies? Its only at seminaries that are producing a small number of Pastors in the PCA. (And, we can probably add the OPC). Its not RTS or Covenant. Are you thinking of Westminster; I guess that would be a major player? In fact back in the late 70's and early 80's there was this big kerfuffle at RTS regarding Theonomy (Bahnsen & his adherents). Finally, RTS purged the theonomists from the seminary.

I have heard where teaching elders with ties to these aberrant teachings, not passing examinations in other Presbyteries that they wish to transfer. So, I see action within the next 2 years against these theologies. However, unless they tackle Theonomy then it will always rear its ugly head in some form.