In reply to:
[color:"blue"]Come on Pilgrim, don't be so coy, tell us how you really feel.

I don't think it would be wise for me to do so in regard to your views on a public board! [img]http://www.the-highway.com/w3timages/icons/rofl.gif" alt="rofl" title="rofl[/img]

In reply to:
[color:"blue"]But seriously, I have been studying eschatology for over 15 years. I have based my remarks on very credible scholarly research, some of which I have documented (unlike your undocumented comment above).

Congratulations on your 15 years, but they pale in comparison to the years some of us have been studying. Yet, that is certainly no guarantee of coming to learn the truth, eh? Your estimation of what is credible scholarly research is rather subjective, and no doubt it would be rejected by others. My comments are certainly "documented" and can be found on The Highway if you would only take the time to look. [img]http://www.the-highway.com/w3timages/icons/wink.gif" alt="wink" title="wink[/img]

In reply to:
[color:"blue"]Your hyperbolic statement only reveals a very emotional person who is very touchy on some topics.

Well, thank you for that Dr. Phil!! I will admit I do have a strong distaste for cultic views which are detrimental to the historic faith.

In reply to:
[color:"blue"]Both you and Joe seem to love to put words in other people's mouths. I never criticized Dr. Venema,

Did you even bother to actually READ what I wrote before criticizing?

But I suppose you would say that Cornelius Venema, for example, is simply totally confused and ignorant of history in this matter
Given your ridiculous statement about Dispensationalism predating Amillennialism and knowing how Venema documents carefully the TRUE history of the Amillennial and Postmillennial views, it is a reasonable conclusion on my part that you would also criticize him as one who is totally ignorant of history, etc...

To be perfectly honest, I have too many Postmillennial authors already in my library who I do have respect for, even though I disagree with their view. They are the older writers who were far more amiable and conservative in their use of the Scriptures than their modern progeny, which may be an insult to them to even use the term "progeny". In fact I have more books that aren't Amillennial than those that are. But, since all one needs to learn of Amillennialism is the Bible, there is really no need to buy any more. [img]http://www.the-highway.com/w3timages/icons/evilgrin.gif" alt="evilgrin" title="evilgrin[/img]


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]