<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr>[color:"blue"]Again, whether Amill is older or younger than Postmillennialism, is not a fundamental issue.</font><hr></blockquote><p> Then why did you raise it? [img]http://www.the-highway.com/w3timages/icons/drop.gif" alt="drop" title="drop[/img] [color:red]You said:</font color=red><br><br><blockquote>[color:blue] Amillennialism as a distinctive system began in the late 19th century and was not even labelled as such until the early 20th century. OTOH postmillennialism has a much older history going back to Augustine, Calvin and the English Puritans.</blockquote></font color=blue> [img]http://www.the-highway.com/w3timages/icons/confused.gif" alt="confused" title="confused[/img] After the overwhelming "evidence" that Pilgrim posted and the brief historical comments I quoted (and there are so many more) it is nice to see you finally recant--i.e. [color:red] is not a fundamental issue</font color=red> [img]http://www.the-highway.com/w3timages/icons/idea.gif" alt="idea" title="idea[/img], though it is a very important issue.

Reformed and Always Reforming,