|
|
|
|
|
Posts: 117
Joined: July 2025
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,348
Posts56,544
Members992
| |
Most Online2,383
Jan 12th, 2026
|
|
|
#31649
Wed Mar 22, 2006 7:29 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,904 Likes: 1
Permanent Resident
|
OP
Permanent Resident
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,904 Likes: 1 |
I'm biting off more than I can chew. I thought by getting Horton's new book on Covenant Theology that it would be an easy read and increase my knowledge on the subject. But before reading it, I'm finding out that it is somewhat controversial to my dismay.
Some argue that Horton accepts Kline's view on the unconditional Royal Land Grant position in some of the covenants. To get a better idea, that view is charted out on pp 19 for The NIV Study Bible. The contrary view which is I think more align with O Palmer Robertson is charted out on pp 25 of the Spirit of the Reformation Study Bible.
This is confusing me. Need help in sorting everything.
help.
Oh, Joe gave a link on the thread in the Book Review forum. His link didn't stir up anything. His link set my curiosity wondering, and I went to other sources.
John Chaney
"having been firmly rooted and now being built up in Him and established in your faith . . ." Colossians 2:7
|
|
|
|
|
1 members (Pilgrim),
127
guests, and
38
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
