Joe

Perhaps my understanding of what should be considered Pentecostal/Charismatic is flawed. However, if that is the case then many in the Pentecostal or Charismatic movement have the same flawed view.
Though the majority view of the Baptism of the Holy Spirit with in the movement is that tongues always accompany it. It is also a debated issue with in the movement itself. Many holding that tongues may just be a sign that one is Baptized in the Holy Spirit. But not necessarily because God is the determiner of what gifts He bestows.
What is not debated however is that the Baptism of the Holy Spirit is "the second blessing". This is what I consider to be a mark of a Charismatic, regardless of whether they themselves speak in tongues or not.
By the way, you misunderstood what I was trying to say. I didn't say that one who is Reformed Charismatic necessarily speaks in tongues. But many do believe that it is a gift that is still around today.

Something you may or not also be aware is that many with in the Pentecostal Church also believe that much of what is being passed off as tongues today are not true tongues at all.
I was one of these people and it was probably one of the things that contributed to me leaving the movement.

There are also Charismatics who believe that if one doesn't speak in tongues, then one isn't truly "born again". But then again, with in the movement itself, there are various understandings, usually depending on the denomination, but not necessarily so.

Tom