Kyle,

How much of the goings-on in the PCA do you understand. Sometimes its gets confusing. For instance, I read this in regards to the study
Quote
Overture 2, from Rocky Mountain Presbytery requesting a study committee on Federal Vision, was answered in the affirmative. The Bills and Overture Committee had recommended that the overture for a study committee be answered in the negative. A minority of the committee presented a substitute urging that the overture be answered in the affirmative. After extensive debate the minority report was adopted. The final motion calls for the moderator to appoint a committee of seven who are to report to the 35th General Assembly. (Note: Overtures 11 and 23 also dealt with Federal Vision and were answered in the negative. Overture 26, from Missouri Presbytery, requested General Assembly to consider and recommend its Report on Federal Vision Theology. The overture was answered in the negative without prejudice in that the Report will be printed in the GA Minutes, by which it will be made generally available to the Church.)


-- from the PCA byFaith online newsletter.

What was the reason for the Bills and Overture committee to recommend in the negative, and it took a minority report to get it before the Assembly? What was the debate about?

And there was another overture (#22) which dealt with Steve Wilkins and the Auburn Avenue Session that has not been reported the status of?

John Chaney

"having been firmly rooted and now being built up in Him and established in your faith . . ." Colossians 2:7