|

|
|
|
Posts: 15,025
Joined: April 2001
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,348
Posts56,543
Members992
| |
Most Online2,383 Jan 12th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,040
Persnickety Presbyterian 
|
Persnickety Presbyterian 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,040 |
straw said: There is only one who is inerrant and infallible and you know exactly who that is. No surprise the Book He wrote by His Spirit should also be inerrant and infallible. He as spoken to us through His Son, Heb. 1:2, "in these last days [God] has spoken to us in His Son, whom He appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the world." How did you know that except you have read His Scripture? and out of fear of losing the words we have immortalized the biblio and made it what it was never meant to be. What it was never meant to be? "But He answered and said, 'It is written, "Man shall not live on bread alone, but on every word that proceeds out of the mouth of God"'" (Mt. 4:4). And again, "All Scripture is God-breathed and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work" (2 Tim. 3:16-17). The Scriptures are there to lead us to the Lord, however what do you see in Christendom for centuries and centuries a MIXED messaage. Not one Christian can agree with another for they are all hiding behind their theological position. We are only to have One that unifies us, one that leads us, guides us, comforts us and what was that faithful saying ... ??? .... This He did so that He could have His Spirit living in us. Such a treasure in earthern vessels, but what we have done is to bind a book, put a cover on it and bow down at it. No wonder Rome will not let go her idols, when we have one too. "You do err, not knowing the Scriptures, nor the power of God" (Mt. 22:29). Let the word of God judge between you and me, and the true idolater shall be evident to all.
Kyle
I tell you, this man went down to his house justified.
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
John_C
|
Sat Mar 24, 2007 1:19 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerreancy - working definition
|
Tom
|
Sat Mar 24, 2007 2:35 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
John_C
|
Sat Mar 24, 2007 2:44 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Wes
|
Sat Mar 24, 2007 9:18 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
John_C
|
Sat Mar 24, 2007 11:28 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Tom
|
Sun Mar 25, 2007 3:52 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Pilgrim
|
Sun Mar 25, 2007 4:22 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Tom
|
Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:58 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
tartanarmy
|
Fri Mar 30, 2007 11:25 AM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
John_C
|
Fri Mar 30, 2007 12:16 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Pilgrim
|
Fri Mar 30, 2007 3:25 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
tartanarmy
|
Sun Jun 17, 2007 7:24 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Wes
|
Sun Mar 25, 2007 8:36 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
tartanarmy
|
Mon Mar 26, 2007 11:43 AM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Wes
|
Mon Mar 26, 2007 1:04 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
straw
|
Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:43 AM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Young Catholic
|
Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:31 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Pilgrim
|
Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:22 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Pilgrim
|
Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:41 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
straw
|
Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:28 AM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Wes
|
Sat Jun 23, 2007 2:30 AM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Pilgrim
|
Sat Jun 23, 2007 4:57 AM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Anonymous
|
Sat Jun 23, 2007 6:44 AM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Robin
|
Sat Jun 23, 2007 10:27 AM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
straw
|
Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:16 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
William
|
Sat Jun 23, 2007 3:57 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Kathy
|
Sat Jun 23, 2007 6:15 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
William
|
Sat Jun 23, 2007 10:05 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
Kathy
|
Sun Jun 24, 2007 12:17 AM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
straw
|
Sat Jun 23, 2007 1:06 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
CovenantInBlood
|
Sat Jun 23, 2007 6:51 AM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
straw
|
Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:25 PM
|
Re: Partial Inerrancy - working definition
|
CovenantInBlood
|
Sat Jun 23, 2007 1:55 PM
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
178
guests, and
41
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|