<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr>[color:"blue"]Not to beat a dead horse, but J.I. Packer still teaches at Regent....He is still listed as Full-Time faculty at the Regent Web-Site.</font><hr></blockquote><p><br><br>I stand corrected on Packer's employment. I am quite surprised that he is still listed as on the "full time faculty", rather than as "Professor-Emeritus".<br><br>Also, it was good to see Paul Helm on the faculty. His book Calvin and the Calvinists is very good.<br><br><blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr>[color:"blue"]As to the rest of CT292's post I must agree with Pilgrim, "But it is sheer nonsense to equate a serious inconsistency with abdication"</font><hr></blockquote><p><br><br>Your imputation of Pilgrim's remark does not at all apply to my own comments since I never said that Packer had "abdicated" Calvinism. In fact, my comments are in agreement with Pilgrim's view since I had specifically said that Packer was still a Calvinist. So there is nothing "nonsensical" about my remarks. Packer is indeed "inconsistent" with his calvinism.<br><br><blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr>[color:"blue"]M.L. Jones was not always correct either</font><hr></blockquote><p><br><br>Lloyd-Jones was far more consistent with his puritan-calvinism by separating himself from Packer in 1970. But of course he was "not always correct". Who ever suggested that he was?<br><br>Colin
