Like Wes, I haven't read Enns' book, but I have read Paul Helms' review and some other reviews and blogs on this individual and his controversial book. My opinion is that WTS did the right thing, although it could have been more expedient in its decision. It seems that we are living in a time which is similar, albeit a little less so than what was going on in the mid-1800's when the Church was faced with a plethora of heretical teachings, both from without and within. And we all know the results..... ala: Evangelicalism. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/drop.gif" alt="" />

In His grace,


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]