|
|
|
|
|
Posts: 3,463
Joined: September 2003
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,347
Posts56,542
Members992
| |
Most Online2,383
Jan 12th, 2026
|
|
|
#40547
Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:21 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,892 Likes: 48
Needs to get a Life
|
OP
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,892 Likes: 48 |
I recently watched a short excerpt of a debate by James White on You Tube called 'Why George Bryson Won't Debate Anymore'. I was expecting to hear something that seemed worthy of the title, however although I agreed with James White about the issue, I am not sure why this would cause George Bryson not to debate anymore. The issue was over how John 6 should be interpreted and Bryson gave the standard Arminian answer, yet I am not sure why James White used that particular tactic. Anyone care to tell me why? You can view it here . Tom
Last edited by Tom; Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:23 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
300
guests, and
30
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
