Posts: 117
Joined: July 2025
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,348
Posts56,543
Members992
| |
Most Online2,383 Jan 12th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274 |
Are there any scriptural references to infant baptism etc?? Yes, the myriad references to circumcision in the O.T. which was the old covenant "shadow" of the new covenant baptism just as the ceremonial sacrifices were shadows of the sacrifice offered by Christ. As has been stated several times before in this thread, there is a definite and sure continuity between the old covenant and the new covenant because there is but ONE covenant of grace. The discontinuity is to be found in the administrations of that one covenant beginning with Adam, then Noah, Abraham, Jacob, David, etc. The "sign" was changed to reflect the better/new administration when Messiah came to accomplish all that was before prophesied and shown in shadows and types. Credo-baptists will as a matter of course reject this explanation and bifurcate the one covenant of grace into two "covenants". The more knowledgeable credo-baptists are quick to reject this bifurcation and speak rather of "discontinuity" between the administrations of the one covenant of grace. This is much more helpful and I believe with them, biblical. That we agree to disagree on the degree of continuity/discontinuity is where things should be and thus it is not a matter of breaking union as it usually is between paedos and credos; mostly on the credo side historically. So, if one accepts that baptism has replaced circumcision as the covenant sign and seal, then one does not need a specific NT verse that shows infants were baptized because "believers and their children" being the covenant promise of God was expected and practiced. Further, with such a incredibly important matter as God's covenant any change in that covenant, for example, the dispensing of including children would surely be present in the teaching of Christ and/or the inspired NT writers. I see no NT command to stop the practice of giving covenant children the sign of the covenant. Thus when it says that "households" were baptized, surely if there were children in those families, they were included as they had been for thousands of years before. In His grace,
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Oikos Baptism
|
john
|
Mon Nov 16, 2009 12:33 PM
|
Re: Oikos Baptism
|
Newman
|
Mon Nov 16, 2009 5:25 PM
|
Re: Oikos Baptism
|
john
|
Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:58 PM
|
Re: Oikos Baptism
|
Pilgrim
|
Mon Nov 16, 2009 5:50 PM
|
Re: Oikos Baptism
|
john
|
Tue Nov 17, 2009 1:03 PM
|
Re: Oikos Baptism
|
Pilgrim
|
Tue Nov 17, 2009 1:17 PM
|
Re: Oikos Baptism
|
john
|
Tue Nov 17, 2009 5:27 PM
|
Re: Oikos Baptism
|
Pilgrim
|
Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:17 PM
|
Re: Oikos Baptism
|
john
|
Wed Nov 18, 2009 1:03 PM
|
Re: Oikos Baptism
|
Pilgrim
|
Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:08 PM
|
Re: Oikos Baptism
|
Johan
|
Tue Nov 17, 2009 3:34 PM
|
Re: Oikos Baptism
|
john
|
Tue Nov 17, 2009 5:28 PM
|
Re: Oikos Baptism
|
Johan
|
Tue Nov 17, 2009 7:50 PM
|
Re: Oikos Baptism
|
john
|
Wed Nov 18, 2009 12:54 PM
|
Re: Oikos Baptism
|
Peter
|
Thu Nov 19, 2009 4:54 AM
|
Re: Oikos Baptism
|
Pilgrim
|
Thu Nov 19, 2009 1:08 PM
|
Re: Oikos Baptism
|
Peter
|
Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:23 AM
|
Re: Oikos Baptism
|
Pilgrim
|
Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:36 AM
|
Re: Oikos Baptism
|
gnarley
|
Fri Nov 20, 2009 3:50 AM
|
Re: Oikos Baptism
|
Pilgrim
|
Fri Nov 20, 2009 12:24 PM
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
219
guests, and
34
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|