That is credobaptist and paedobaptist.
There is a common thought that the only thing dividing them is just their view on baptism. Isn't it more than just that. I'm thinking it deals with the fact that the credos make a wider gap in the continuity of the Old and New Testaments than the paedos. IOW, credos reformed types do not ascribed to 'Covenant Theology' in its truest sense.
IOW, credos reformed types do not ascribed to 'Covenant Theology' in its truest sense.
That would all depend on the perspective one is coming from. If one is coming from a Reformed Credo position, then they would say that Reformed Paedos haven't Reformed enough when it come to baptism and CT. Many of them would say that they have the purest form of CT. Others don’t mind not being considered CT and call themselves things such as “Particular Baptists”. For the most part I have found the differences to be a matter of semantics.
However many Paedos believe that they have the purest form of CT and Credos actually have embraced some Dispensationalism with their CT.
I am a Credo CT, so you can guess what I believe on this subject. However, other than that I find myself agreeing with my Paedo brothers and sisters more times than not.
I actually feel very at home on the Highway, as you can probably see by how many posts I have over the years.
Tom
