|

|
|
|
Posts: 3,464
Joined: September 2003
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,351
Posts56,547
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295 Yesterday at 09:40 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,027 Likes: 274
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,027 Likes: 274 |
Is 'Federal Vision' fairly represented here?
Are the objections raised correct? 1) I think FV is fairly represented. What the writer meant by "the first reason why..." would be interesting to know. The question that comes to my mind is, Did the writer mean by "the first reason", the primary reason? or was he simply enumerating a list of things of which this failure to distinguish between the visible and invisible Church was the first that came to mind, or perhaps this quote was simply a reply to a specific question concerning FV's view of the Church? 2. The objections are correct, as far as I'm concerned. 
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
FederalVision Take IV
|
Hitch
|
Mon Apr 02, 2012 5:35 AM
|
Re: FederalVision Take IV
|
Robin
|
Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:27 AM
|
Re: FederalVision Take IV
|
Pilgrim
|
Mon Apr 02, 2012 1:00 PM
|
Re: FederalVision Take IV
|
Hitch
|
Tue Apr 03, 2012 12:02 AM
|
Re: FederalVision Take IV
|
Robin
|
Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:59 AM
|
Re: FederalVision Take IV
|
Hitch
|
Wed Apr 04, 2012 1:44 AM
|
Re: FederalVision Take IV
|
Robin
|
Wed Apr 04, 2012 8:53 AM
|
Re: FederalVision Take IV
|
Pilgrim
|
Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:15 AM
|
Re: FederalVision Take IV
|
Hitch
|
Wed Apr 04, 2012 3:05 PM
|
Re: FederalVision Take IV
|
Robin
|
Wed Apr 04, 2012 4:07 PM
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
152
guests, and
78
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|