When it comes to eschatology I hold to an a-millennial understanding of the subject.
I have found that this is not necessarily always popular even among those who hold to TULIP.
In fact one person that I usually agree with when it comes to Scripture said to me (quite forceful I might add).
Quote
Those who are A-mil in their eschatology are not consistent.
While most (and rightly so) hold to 6/24 hour days of creation; they do not use the same hermeneutic when it come to their eschatology.

Now I understand that in reality Dispensationalists such as this person, in reality are not as consistent as they claim to be and don't hold a wooden literal understanding of eschatology.
However, I was wondering if there is a way to show this to someone without going into a lot of detail?
I have found that usually I am most successful in getting my points across when I am able to get their attention first. After that, they seem to be more open to what I have say.

Anyone have an idea that might be effective for that particular purpose?

Tom

Last edited by Tom; Wed May 22, 2013 1:01 AM.