1. I don't consider your response to be a SUMMARY of your beliefs concerning the law found in Scripture. It was a simple request on my part but evidently you do not intend to provide an answer. scratchchin

2. You asked the members here to read that long and difficult article, but it seems you are not willing to read even one of the articles I provided a link for all of which are much shorter and cogent to read. Why is that?

3. The Church Fathers do provide interesting reading but unfortunately, it is widely known that they are hardly a reliable source of biblical truth. Most were fraught with errors and some serious damnable heretical errors. Even during the time when the Apostles walked on this earth they warned that false teachers and prophets existed and more would come and lead many astray. This has been true throughout the history of the Church and even Christ Himself said that His coming would be timely because the falling away of alleged believers would be en mass, so much so that if His coming were delayed even the elect would be carried away. The fact is, there has always been a remnant which the Spirit has preserved along with orthodoxy throughout the ages. The Church Fathers were unfortunately not generally part of that preservation.

4. Again, because you have chosen not to provide a summary of what your doctrine is concerning the law and its implications for the Christian life, I cannot help but conclude that you have an agenda which you are trying to promote. I do not recall any real question(s) you have asked which you sought answers.


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]