Posts: 706
Joined: May 2016
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,347
Posts56,542
Members992
| |
Most Online2,383 Jan 12th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274 |
Hello???????? The discussion is NOT whether GOD can sin. With very few oddball exceptions, the true Christian Church has for centuries confessed that GOD cannot sin nor is He the author of sin. Impeccability vs Peccability (not capable to sin vs capable to sin) in this discussion is focused upon the incarnate Son of God; Jesus the Christ Who was one person with two distinct natures; divine and human. Thus the disagreement has always been whether the human nature of the Lord Christ was capable of sinning. The underlying issue, which I believe is beyond the ability of any human being to fully comprehend or appreciate is the glorious mystery of the exact relationship between the two natures. The Creed of Chalcedon expresses what GOD has revealed to man quite adequately: Creed of Chalcedon This creed was adopted at the Fourth Ecumenical Council, held at Chalcedon, located in what is now Turkey, in 451, as a response to certain heretical views concerning the nature of Christ. It established the orthodox view that Christ has two natures (human and divine) that are unified in one person. Therefore, following the holy fathers, we all with one accord teach men to acknowledge one and the same Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, at once complete in Godhead and complete in manhood, truly God and truly man, consisting also of a reasonable soul and body; of one substance with the Father as regards his Godhead, and at the same time of one substance with us as regards his manhood; like us in all respects, apart from sin; as regards his Godhead, begotten of the Father before the ages, but yet as regards his manhood begotten, for us men and for our salvation, of Mary the Virgin, the God-bearer; one and the same Christ, Son, Lord, Only-begotten, recognized in two natures, without confusion, without change, without division, without separation; the distinction of natures being in no way annulled by the union, but rather the characteristics of each nature being preserved and coming together to form one person and subsistence, not as parted or separated into two persons, but one and the same Son and Only-begotten God the Word, Lord Jesus Christ; even as the prophets from earliest times spoke of him, and our Lord Jesus Christ himself taught us, and the creed of the fathers has handed down to us.
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Impeccability vs Peccability
|
Tom
|
Sat Jan 16, 2021 7:21 PM
|
Re: Impeccability vs Peccability
|
Pilgrim
|
Sat Jan 16, 2021 11:38 PM
|
Re: Impeccability vs Peccability
|
Tom
|
Sun Jan 17, 2021 5:37 AM
|
Re: Impeccability vs Peccability
|
Pilgrim
|
Sun Jan 17, 2021 11:50 AM
|
Re: Impeccability vs Peccability
|
042Dave
|
Sun Jan 17, 2021 11:07 AM
|
Re: Impeccability vs Peccability
|
Pilgrim
|
Sun Jan 17, 2021 11:39 AM
|
Re: Impeccability vs Peccability
|
042Dave
|
Sun Jan 17, 2021 12:12 PM
|
Re: Impeccability vs Peccability
|
Pilgrim
|
Sun Jan 17, 2021 12:31 PM
|
Re: Impeccability vs Peccability
|
042Dave
|
Sun Jan 17, 2021 12:51 PM
|
Re: Impeccability vs Peccability
|
chestnutmare
|
Sun Jan 17, 2021 1:11 PM
|
Re: Impeccability vs Peccability
|
042Dave
|
Sun Jan 17, 2021 1:26 PM
|
Re: Impeccability vs Peccability
|
Pilgrim
|
Sun Jan 17, 2021 3:05 PM
|
Re: Impeccability vs Peccability
|
042Dave
|
Sun Jan 17, 2021 3:12 PM
|
Re: Impeccability vs Peccability
|
chestnutmare
|
Sun Jan 17, 2021 3:35 PM
|
Re: Impeccability vs Peccability
|
chestnutmare
|
Sun Jan 17, 2021 12:02 PM
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
636
guests, and
28
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|