|

|
|
|
Posts: 15,025
Joined: April 2001
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,348
Posts56,543
Members992
| |
Most Online2,383 Jan 12th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,892 Likes: 48
Needs to get a Life
|
OP
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,892 Likes: 48 |
Maybe I was not clear enough? I personally do not see “Baptismal Regeneration” in WCF 28.
I have read it for myself.
My main reason for asking this question is within the quotes of this particular person. Mainly, the charge that before the Princetonian business with Warfield, it was understood that WCF 28 was talking ‘Baptismal Regeneration’.
Perhaps, because I have no dog in this fight, I should have just ignored the person. However, I am curious if there was even a Princetonian controversy (or whatever he wants to call it). If so did it involve Baptismal Regeneration?
I suspect this person is either lying through his teeth, because he is Roman Catholic, or another sect that believes in Baptismal Regeneration.
By the way, another reason I brought this up. Is because I am a bit of a student of Church history. It was part of the reason that made me embrace the ‘Doctrines of Grace’.
I hope I am clear now.
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
741
guests, and
113
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|