Onefear,<blockquote><font size=1>In reply to:</font><hr>[color:"blue"]A bit tongue in cheek? Sure. Hyperbole? Sure, but with a point. BTW, I quote this NOT to draw a parallel between modern theology (reformed or otherwise) and Liberalism (there might or might not be such a parallel), BUT INSTEAD to show that sometimes the bawdy is more real than rarified.<br><br>I hope this helps. Check it out when the first issue is published in a couple of months. The proof of the pudding will be in the tasting. I hope it tastes good!</font><hr></blockquote><p>It sounds tasteless to me. If what you've provided is a sample of what Pantagruel has to offer I think its a waste of time. The church already has all kinds of critics. We don't need more.<br><br>Harold Camping has made a practice of pointing out the flaws in the Church of Jesus Christ. Now he advocates that the Church age has ended and the Holy Spirit isn't operative in the church any longer. Your publication sounds like its going to pick up where he left off. Certainly there are many faults in the church but does criticism in this crude form serve any positive purpose? We need leaders who are going to build up the body of Christ instead of tearing it down.<br><br>Most believers already know the church has flaws and blemishes. We don't need a new publication to show us that. We need leaders not critics!<br><br><br>Wes

When I survey the wondrous cross on which the Prince of Glory died, my richest gain I count but loss and pour contempt on all my pride. - Isaac Watts