|

|
|
|
Tom
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 4,892
Joined: April 2001
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,348
Posts56,543
Members992
| |
Most Online2,383 Jan 12th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,892 Likes: 48
Needs to get a Life
|
OP
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,892 Likes: 48 |
Pilgrim That is a good question to which I don't have the answer to, however if you are curious enough you may find the answer to that in the thread I mentioned in my initial post. http://pub54.ezboard.com/fdiscussingreformationfrm1Dan is the person that brought up Peter Masters. Again, I am not trying to drag you into anything; I am just trying to get to the truth of the matter. If you do go to that URL, you will see that Peter Masters uses some of the same Reformed people you mention to show the elongated view. I am wondering if this particular issue is worth the amount of time it is taking me to find out the truth. Tom
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
“Physician of Souls” by Peter Masters
|
Tom
|
Wed Nov 05, 2003 5:40 AM
|
Re: “Physician of Souls” by Peter Masters
|
Pilgrim
|
Mon Nov 10, 2003 4:50 PM
|
Re: “Physician of Souls” by Peter Masters
|
Tom
|
Tue Nov 11, 2003 11:52 PM
|
Re: “Physician of Souls” by Peter Masters
|
Pilgrim
|
Wed Nov 12, 2003 1:24 AM
|
Re: “Physician of Souls” by Peter Masters
|
Tom
|
Wed Nov 12, 2003 4:23 PM
|
Re: “Physician of Souls” by Peter Masters
|
Tom
|
Thu Nov 13, 2003 7:51 AM
|
Re: “Physician of Souls” by Peter Masters
|
Pilgrim
|
Thu Nov 13, 2003 8:30 AM
|
Re: “Physician of Souls” by Peter Masters
|
carlos
|
Thu Nov 13, 2003 4:44 PM
|
Re: “Physician of Souls” by Peter Masters
|
Tom
|
Thu Nov 13, 2003 8:15 PM
|
Re: “Physician of Souls” by Peter Masters
|
carlos
|
Thu Nov 13, 2003 8:30 PM
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
201
guests, and
24
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|