Quote
jmp writes:
As for me, I think it is sinful to defend a nation like ours as it is - its established religion is atheism (witness the public schools and our civil courts).
On the surface, at least, one could conclude that only a "Christian" nation should be defended by Christians; where there is an "established religion" (national and Christian) and the "civil courts" administer justice from Christian law; whatever that might be. Would that be an accurate, albeit simple summation of your view? And directly related, could this be accurately understood to be that of Theonomic Reconstructionism for the most part?

In His Grace,

[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]