The two positions you put forth have little "moderate" ground. Too often 'moderate' means "unwilling to take a stand". Moderate can also be viewed as the middle ground, when we are suppose to take a stand specifically for truth. Perhaps you could offer an example of this moderate view? Both groups you offered as examples are incorrect. Hyper-calvinism and pelgianism are both wrong. However, in between those examples are many other positions, most of which are also wrong enough to discard them. There simply is no moderate position when you stand for truth. To moderate truth with what?
