This is one of those distinctions that I seem to understand when I am reading, but then I can't seem to keep in my head.

Can someone help me sort out these two positions? Perhaps simple definitions of both would give me a hook upon which to hang the details.

Does the evidentialist believe that there is provable evidence for the existence of God while the presuppositionalist simply presupposes the existence of God? Does he "presuppose" on the basis of logic? Is the existence of God even what is in view when talking about this concept or is it something more/different?

Help!

Trust the past to God's mercy, the present to God's love and the future to God's providence." - St. Augustine
Hiraeth